|
|
|
Analytic
Advice
The
following examples are designed to help analysts understand the structure
of the AHAA dataset and its relationship to the Add Health study. These
examples expand upon information presented in the Add
Health & AHAA page and we suggest researchers familiarize themselves
with that information before continuing to the Analytic Advice page.
When using AHAA and Add Health data, analysts must pay particular attention
to how AHAA transcript information intersects with the Add Health surveys
for different Add Health cohorts. Though these examples provide guidance,
we encourage researchers to think critically about the correspondence
between the timing of the Add Health surveys and AHAA data when selecting
appropriate samples and variables to use to address their specific research
questions.
• Example
1: Conceptual Model of the AHAA Study
• Example 2: Add Health Cohort/Academic Year Match
• Example 3: Using Add Health & AHAA to Predict
Add Health WII Survey Outcomes
• Example 4: Using Add Health & AHAA to Predict
AHAA End of High School Outcomes
• Example 5: Using Add Health & AHAA to Predict
Add Health WIII Outcomes
Example 1: Conceptual Model of the AHAA Study

This
conceptual model gives an overview of all substantive aspects of the AHAA
data set – including data intended for future release (i.e. curricular
content exposure, and social contexts). Note that survey-based indicators
capturing issues pertaining to health, relationships, socio-economic status,
work, and post-secondary education are included in the Add Health data
base.
(back
to top)
Example 2: Add Health Cohort/Academic Year Match

This
example illustrates how course-taking and survey data match up for students
enrolled in 9th grade in the Fall of 1994. For this cohort, their 9th
grade course-taking (considered their “Year 1” of high school)
occurred during the same year as the In-School and Wave I surveys. Wave
II corresponds with their second year of high school course-taking (their
“Year 2”). The “linking
indicators” in the AHAA data set provides school year and grade
level indicators which enable analysts to match Add Health respondents’
Wave I survey data to their transcript-determined academic year placement
(i.e. Year 1, Year 2, Year 3, Year 4).
(back
to top)
Example 3: Using Add Health & AHAA to Predict Add Health WII Survey
Outcomes
When
using Add Health (Wave I and demographic information) & AHAA transcript
data to predict Wave II survey outcomes, researchers must first determine
which information for each cohort is relevant to include in their analyses.
This decision hinges upon an assessment of each cohort’s academic
placement (i.e. Year 1, Year 2, Year 3, or Year 4 of their high school
course-taking) when the Add Health Wave I and Wave II surveys were conducted.
Figures A & B below provide suggestions for how analysts can select
which cohort data to use in their predictive models. For example, Figure
B demonstrates that researchers interested in examining correlations between
Wave I and AHAA information, and outcomes measured at Wave II should use
Year 1 AHAA data for students considered to be 9th graders at Wave I,
Year 2 information for 10th graders, and Year 3 information for 11th graders.
For some research questions, it may be appropriate to include the 7th,
8th, or 12th grade Add Health cohorts. However, as Figures A & B graphically
illustrate, decisions about including these other cohorts into analyses
must be based on a clear understanding of the correspondence between their
academic placement (Year 1, Year, 2, Year 3, or Year 4) and the timing
of the Wave I and Wave II surveys.


(back
to top)
Example 4: Using Add Health & AHAA to Predict AHAA End of High School
Outcomes
Figures
C & D (below) highlight suggested Add Health & AHAA data to use
for predicting end of high school academic outcomes such as highest math
level attained or cumulative GPA. These figures, as in the case of Example
3, illustrate the importance of evaluating the relationship between the
timing of student coursework and the Add Health surveys when selecting
samples for this type of analysis. Significantly, these figures point
out that researchers can choose to use the AHAA data that corresponds
to Wave I (i.e. 9th graders’ Year 1 AHAA data, 10th graders’
Year 2 data, 11th graders’ Year 3 information), or they can opt
to focus on all cohorts’ Year 1 (or Year 2 or Year 3) AHAA information
as a baseline or predictive measure of end of high school academic outcomes.


(back
to top)
Example 5: Using Add Health & AHAA to Predict Add Health WIII Outcomes
Because students from all cohorts have completed their high
school course-taking by Wave III (with the exception of a small number
of students who were in high school for longer than four years), predicting
Wave III outcomes with AHAA data involves a less complex process than
required for other types of analyses. For this type of analysis, analysts
may elect to use subjects’ Wave I Survey data or the AHAA data that
corresponds to Wave I. Researchers can also use the cumulative, end of
high school, AHAA measures. Researchers should pay attention to how long
subjects were out of high school when Wave III was conducted (6 years
for the Wave I 12th grade cohort vs. 1 year for the 7th grade cohort)
and how far along subjects were in their high school years when the Wave
I survey occurred (for the 9th grade cohort it was the beginning of high
school whereas for the 11th grade cohort it was nearer the end) when designing
their analyses.


(back
to top)
|
|
 |